The Compact Institute

Every technological transition is a choice point: a moment where political and economic power are reorganized.

We need a new compact that redefines technology’s relationship to the public.

Explore the five dimensions Governance Institutions Plurality Tools Bridge

Projects
  • Lessons ahead of 2028

    We interview 2026 primary candidates about their theory of change and diagnosis of failure points to inform strategy for the 2028 presidential election.

  • Shared data commons

    A pilot proposal for structured transparency between frontier labs and government statistical agencies.

  • Corporate governance

    Today’s corporate structures don’t hold AI megacorps accountable for their effects on the public. We’re exploring new institutional forms, such as an enforceable public fiduciary, that bind firms to account for the public interest through both internal governance and verifiable external checks.

  • Functionalism as institutional design

    Different institutional forms are suited to different problem spaces. The equivalent principle applied to AI governance include an IAEA-style scientific body for verifying compute and training claims, a NTSB-style bureau for investigating AI incidents across companies, and a FRO-style entity for funding shared safety infrastructure like evals and interpretability tools.

Tools
Blogs
  • A New Compact

    Introducing the Compact Institute.

  • Causal Power

    How does power concentrate across multiple world models?

  • Measuring the AI economy

    A shared data commons for the government, labs, and the public

  • Whose company is it?

    Part 1: The rise of planetary-scale technology companies, and their stakeholders